bloc 33rd Square Business Tools - artficial intelligence 33rd Square Business Tools: artficial intelligence - All Post
Showing posts with label artficial intelligence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label artficial intelligence. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 19, 2017


Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence can now create new art we have never seen before and compose new music we have never heard before. Christian Bauckhage talked about the current state of AI at the recent CeBIT conference and the direction of where it is heading.


Christian Bauckhage discussed the current state of AI at the recent CeBIT conference and the direction of where it is heading towards. It talks about all the decision makings based on information could be replaced by AI. Check out the video below!

Bauckhage started his talk with a quote from Albert Allen Bartlett, the late physicist who argued against population growth for most of his career, based on his understanding of exponential mathematics, "The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function."

To regular readers, this statement will seem familiar, as it has been repeated countless times in various incarnations by the likes of Ray Kurzweil, Peter Diamandis and others associated with the Singularity.

For Bauckhage, he unpacks the history of human civilization and relates how technology is on the exponential curve as well, and the consequences are as a result, astounding. "The nature of exponential growth is so dramatically fast, that at the end, they outgrow everything that has happened up until then," he explains.

Related articles
Bauckhage goes on to explain how the technologies of big data, computation and deep learning systems are compounding the exponential growth of artificial intelligence. "Indeed, we are living in very exciting times," he states. "What has happened in the last couple of years is nothing short [of] miraculous."

"This future is going on right now, and it's not just three years down the road."
Bauckhage does a good job of explaining why deep learning is causing such a stir and has attracted such interest and investment. "We have seen dramatic progress in the last five to seven years in the area of cognitive computing," he shows. "We have seen breakthroughs in the the areas of automatic text analysis and understanding; we have seen breakthroughs in the the areas of automatic image understanding, speech recognition and robotics."

One of the key takeaways from Bauckhage is that even though he is deeply entrenched in the world of artificial intelligence the progress is even surprising him. He teaches game AI, and said as recently as two years ago that artificial intelligence would never beat the top human players of Go in his lifetime. Lee Sedol, the Go world champion was, as was well publicized, trounced by Google DeepMind's AlphaGo system last year.

He also shows another case where researchers at the University of Cincinnati used an AI flight combat simulation system based in fuzzy logic and genetic programming on a Raspberry Pi computer that can beat any fighter pilot. Bauckhage is surprised this story has not had wider coverage.

AI systems are already progamming their own code, and creating art and music too, Bauckhage demonstrates. With open source systems like Google's TensorFlow now reaching wide distribution, the power to create AI systems is set to explode even further. Microsoft and Facebook also have open sourced neural network libraries.

The next big thing, according to Bauckhage is quantum computing. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning depend to a large extent on things we call optimization and search, and this is something quantum computers can do very very fast, so things will continue to accelerate," he predicts.

Christian Bauckhage

Bauckhage concludes the talk with a very bold prediction that, "in 10 years from now, everything that is a process—and I think you know that composing new music is a process; doing and accountant sheet is a process; planning a logistic chain is a process—will be done by an AI ten years from now."

He also states that largest artificial neural network on the planet last year had 160 billion synapses, which would be about equivalent to the brain of a bee. Continued exponential growth of neural networks would therefore yield the development of a human-level artificial neural network by the year 2029.

Right on schedule.

Bauckhage is a professor for media information at the Bonn-Aachen International Center for Information Technology (B-IT) and represents the area Multimedia Pattern Recognition at Fraunhofer IAIS. He earned his diploma in computer science in 1998 after studying in Bielefeld and Grenoble; In 2002, he promoted to Dr.-Ing. In Bielefeld, where he subsequently worked as a technical coordinator for a successful EU research project in the field of cognitive vision. From 2004 to 2008, he did research at the Center for Vision Research at York University in Toronto and at the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories in Berlin. His research focuses on efficient pattern recognition and machine learning algorithms and applications of his work can be found in fields as diverse as physics, biology, social media, or business data analysis.




SOURCE  Skinome


By  33rd SquareEmbed





Monday, April 27, 2015


 Artificial Intelligence
In Avengers: Age of Ultron, the villain starts out as an artificial intelligence experiment gone wrong. So is AI really the biggest threat to humanity? 





Artificial intelligence development is proceeding at an accelerating rate, but will it reach human-level (strong AI), and is this a threat to humanity itself?  A growing number of researchers, scientists and concerned people are raising the alarm about the existential threat of AI.

Much of the recent dialog about the threat of artificial intelligence is coming from discussion following the release of Nick Bostrom's book, Superintelligence. The book explores intellectual models of the sometimes dire possibilities when machines exceed human intelligence. For Bostrom, superintelligence is not the point when AI conquors the  Turing Test—it's what comes after that. Once we build a system as smart as a human, that machine will try to improve itself, which enables it to further improve itself—recursively and exponentially.


Speaking at the MIT Aeronautics and Astronautics department’s Centennial Symposium in October, SpaceX and Tesla head Elon Musk referred to artificial intelligence as "summoning the demon."
I think we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. If I were to guess like what our biggest existential threat is, it’s probably that. So we need to be very careful with the artificial intelligence. Increasingly scientists think there should be some regulatory oversight maybe at the national and international level, just to make sure that we don’t do something very foolish. With artificial intelligence we are summoning the demon. In all those stories where there’s the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, it’s like yeah he’s sure he can control the demon. Didn't work out.
Physicist Stephen Hawking told the BBC in December he believes future developments in artificial intelligence have the potential to eradicate mankind. The Cambridge professor, who relies on a form of artificial intelligence to communicate, said if technology could match human capabilities “it would take off on its own, and re-design itself at an ever increasing rate.”



Related articles
He also said that due to biological limitations, there would be no way humans could match the speed of development of technology.

"Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete and would be superseded. The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race."


“Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete and would be superseded,” he said. “The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.”

In an open letter, drafted by the Future of Life Institute and signed by hundreds of academics and technologists, calls on the artificial intelligence science community to not only invest in research into making good decisions and plans for the future, but to also thoroughly check how those advances might affect society.

The letter’s authors recognize the remarkable successes in “speech recognition, image classification, autonomous vehicles, machine translation, legged location and question-answering systems,” and argue that it is not unfathomable that the research may lead to the eradication of disease and poverty. But they insisted that “our AI systems must do what we want them to do” and laid out research objectives that will “help maximize the societal benefit of AI.”

How Dangerous is Artificial Intelligence?

As capabilities in these areas and others cross the threshold from laboratory research to economically valuable technologies, a virtuous cycle takes hold whereby even small improvements in performance are worth large sums of money, prompting greater investments in research. There is now a broad consensus that AI research is progressing steadily, and that its impact on society is likely to increase. The potential benefits are huge, since everything that civilization has to offer is a product of human intelligence; we cannot predict what we might achieve when this intelligence is magnified by the tools AI may provide, but the eradication of disease and poverty are not unfathomable. Because of the great potential of AI, it is important to research how to reap its benefits while avoiding potential pitfalls.
"I am in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence," Bill Gates recently wrote in a Reddit AMA. "First the machines will do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent. That should be positive if we manage it well. A few decades after that though the intelligence is strong enough to be a concern. I agree with Elon Musk and some others on this and don't understand why some people are not concerned."

What do you think?  Are you concerned about the threat of artificial intelligence?

SOURCE  FW: Thinking

By 33rd SquareEmbed